Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem, perhaps illusory that it's easy to fix, is that the model will choose solutions that are a year old, e.g. thinking database/logger versions from December '24 are new and usable in a greenfield project despite newer quarterly LTS releases superseding them. I try to avoid humanizing these models, but could it be that in training/posttraining one could make it so the timestamp is fed in via the system prompt and actually respected? I've begged models to choose "new" dependencies after $DATE but they all still snap back to 2024


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: