I think the Where's Waldo example, while not technically zero knowledge, gives a pretty good intuition of the idea behind it.
It certainly gives a "layperson" example of being able to prove you know something without revealing it, which isn't the whole definition of ZK but is the idea driving it.
It certainly gives a "layperson" example of being able to prove you know something without revealing it, which isn't the whole definition of ZK but is the idea driving it.