Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why was the steel mill producing a lot of chemical pollution?

Steel makes a lot of mill scale and slag, but those are generally inert. It’s a physically dirty process, but not a chemically dirty one, unless I’m missing something?

And certainly nothing I’m aware of there would make it unsuitable for even landfill.



I looked up the EPA report for the brownsite. It listed arsenic, barium, multiple chromium compounds, 2,4-dimethylphenol ethylbenzen lead, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, methlyene chloride, naphthalene, toluene, and xylene at hazardous levels. It also mentions steel, zinc, and nickel dust and fumes.

I do know that I drove by the old site a few years ago, and you can see the outlines of not just the buildings but the machinery because the dirt is a different color, and there's either no or very little grass or just stubborn weeds growing in those areas.


Thanks, that was very informative.


A lot of steel is coated with grease or oil to avoid rusting. Just by nature of working with it you also need solvents to remove it. The degreasers of the past were magically powerful and environmentally catastrophic. Never mind all the oil/grease used.


Steel is alloyed with a lot of things, some of them toxic (lead comes to mind). If any of that spills.


I think some additives to the steel can be really poisonous? Chrome?

I guess you get a lot of heavy metal slag?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: