Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't at all disagree with you, but at the kind of money you'd be making at an org like OAI, it's easy to envision there being a ceiling, past which the additional financial compensation doesn't necessarily matter that much.

The problem with the argument is that most places saying this are paying more like a sub-basement, not that there can't genuinely be more important things.

That said, Sam Altman is also a guy who stuck nondisparagement terms into their equity agreement... and in that same vein, framing poaching as "someone has broken into our home" reads like cult language.






We shouldn’t even be using the offensive word “poaching.” As an employee, I am not a deer or wild boar owned by a feudal lord by working for his company. And another employer isn’t some thief stealing me away. I have agency and control over who I enter into an employment arrangement with!

I don't disagree with this either -- it's very clearly just a free market working both ways.

It also immediately reminds me of the no-call agreements companies had with each other last decade 10 or 15yrs ago.


So then, is "headhunting" more or less bad?

I think anything that evokes “hunting on someone else’s land for his property” is equally inappropriate.

Would "bought" be better then? implies slavery!

There's a word for this, it's called being hired.

"Making a more competitive offer"



Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: