Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I do feel bad for the situation in which these guys have landed, but it’s also something that seemed inevitable long ago.

They focused on delivering a secure user-controlled operating system for phones. They used as a base an OS stewarded by an advertising and spyware company which couldn’t have values more directly opposed to theirs. They focused primarily on hardware by that same company. Other hardware was not supported in what sounds like “perfect being the enemy of good”. Eg: other devices might have been less suitable if you were targeted by a nation-state, but would have been superb for the 99%, and also avoided funding their opposition.

They let their antithesis have all the cards. It’s been an uphill battle which they’ve managed to push hard. But it’s hard to see a future, just as it’s always been hard to see a long term future for GrapheneOS.




There is so much misinformation about GrapheneOS. Other hardware is not supported for very good reasons. Mainly because the most basic security features are simply not available on other hardware. Google goes out of their way to support other operating systems with proper verified boot using custom signing keys. Also Pixels have proper dedicated security module, Titan M, which I believe are missing from most, if not all other options. Also MTE support. Hardware security is important and none of the current options match Pixels.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: