Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But dB without reference makes sense in many many occasions. Either because the reference is implicit (not ideal, but we have many implicit assumptions in communication), or because it's genuinely a ratio. Attenuation, gain.

If you every find an "official" written document that uses dB not as attenuation/gain and is not specifying the reference (at least in a footnote), it's written either by idiots or for idiots, or both.




No it doesn't. It's always bad for the actual unit to be implicit.


The unit of a gain/attenuation is [1]. There is no implicit unit in that case.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: