> By using, reproducing, modifying, distributing, performing or displaying any portion or element of Gemma, Model Derivatives including via any Hosted Service, (each as defined below) (collectively, the "Gemma Services") or otherwise accepting the terms of this Agreement, you agree to be bound by this Agreement.

https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms

Worth knowing if you're planning to use this model for production usage/with a business.

So once again, I don't understand what "open" is supposed to mean when they call models like these "open weights". What part exactly is "open"?

There's no doubt Gemma's license is less permissive than other models and that it has less community finetuners for that reason.

Here's OSI's argument about this when Meta's llama put such limitations in their license: https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-ope...

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html