Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
[flagged] Bluesky Bans Lunduke for Having Common Views [video] (youtube.com)
5 points by snvzz 7 months ago | hide | past | favorite | 9 comments


This person seems to have intentionally tried the break the algorithm by posting like 6 different controversial views in one post. They were not intentionally trying to engage in discourse. Trolls often have common views, that’s what makes them trolls.


This is why I think the web would be better without large platforms, only personal websites. No chance of huge crowds causing echo chambers.


Why is it the web seems to be the one outlier environment that we care about echo chambers? Almost everywhere else seems to have some definition of relevance and propriety, also, it seems like your argument is not that diversity of thought is good, but that large echo chambers themselves are bad? I.e. you’re saying you’d rather not have a big diverse website because it risks a big echo chamber?


I think diversity of thought can just as easily be created with smaller, individual websites. For example, one person can say something and then I can quote them on my website. Only the process is slower and invites less knee-jerk reacting and commenting that seems to live on our dopamine reactions. A natural speed limit created by a lack of quick-reply mechanisms would probably make everyone more thoughtful, and a friction point to responding wouldn't create crowding effects like mass upvoting/downvoting.

The internet is different I think because of it doesn't have the physical limiations of scale. In real life, a small group can get together, yes it can be a sort of "echo chamber", but they are limited by the size of their group which is usually small.


No chance at all? Surely creating your own site is creating your own echo chamber


Not really, because thinking by myself can easily be modified with challenging comments. It's much easier for a person to change their mind or ideas (at least if they're open minded) without a million people egging them on. The danger is when a person becomes hyped on their ideas because of mass support for them.


I have no idea who this Landuke guy is. However, skipping through his video, I can only agree. Bluesky is for people who want to live in a particular filter bubble. Diversity of opinions is not welcome. Their motto could be "go woke or go away". Not really news. It's just kind of pathetic.

I appreciate X for the fact that all sorts of views are represented. The "algorithm" wants to funnel you into a filter bubble, but you can fight this by choosing what accounts you want to follow.


“I appreciate X for the fact that all sorts of views are represented.”

Unless you’re against H1b Visa’s. All sirts of views are represented ion BlueSky as well? It’s just a different set of ideas.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/elon-musk-accused-...


You said: Mikä on Bryan Lunduken etunimi?

ChatGPT said: Bryan Lunduken etunimi on Bryan.

You said: Same in English please.

ChatGPT said: Bry

(!) I'm unable to produce a response.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: