Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I actually find it rather interesting how many people here, in a forum I generally assume to be better informed than elsewhere, seem wholly unaware of the dramatic decrease in insects over the last few decades.


People who think they know better are more likely to comment than those who will simply say "huh, interesting!" You will often get a somewhat biased set of comments.


I mean, hop into any threat remotely related to COVID and you'll see people come out in swarms of common science denial.

Just because people might be knowledgeable about certain technologies doesn't make them knowledgeable about anything else. In fact I'd argue that it heavily biases them to making more mistakes in other fields, especially considering that many tech problems are 'solved' by going to a search engine -- that's not a good way to do science.


I also find it rather interesting to see talks about insect decline while it's only one part of the larger issue, rated by some as important as the climate crisis: the biodiversity crisis. Dramatic decreases are happening for way more species than just insects.


But is it “only one part” or more like a reliable indicator of the overall ecological health?


Both?


> Both?

I see. It just sounded like you were dismissive of that one metric based on this part of your original response:

> I also find it rather interesting to see talks about insect decline while it's only one part of the larger issue.

Which is why I asked.


Strong "I am very smart" contrarian energy here.

See also this tale: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376002/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: