Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xfp's commentslogin

Daily. On top of general search engines, I have a bunch of custom ones added to Firefox so I can skip the Google/Bing/Yandex step.


It appears there is a bug with it on Firefox. The game loads with a word and what looks like five possible answers, but after a few seconds the screen goes blank.


Self-hosted VPNs cleanly solve the port access problem using free software. As a bonus, there's generally minimal added latency because it's just another encrypted direct TCP connection.


Given all the remote work tech that the pandemic helped mature, the answer seems obvious.


Seems but isn't due to the way taxation/jurisdiction/licensure works. Where you are doing your work from and where the benefactor of that work are make a big difference. Example: Doctors can't telehealth over State lines. Lawyers likewise. Employers aren't supposed to allow migrant workers to work from across state lines from their address of record.

A great deal of draconian control is actually implemented through employment and licensure law, and as with most things in real life, come bundled with a surprising amount of detail. Part of why I've become particularly dissatisfied with the U.S. as of late, as so much of it is predicated on actually keeping you locked into one geographical location.


Doctors can definitely telehealth through state lines, they only need to get license approval from the specific states.


I believe it depends on the state. I'm not positive but my therapist friends can only operate in certain states remotely.


> so much of it is predicated on actually keeping you locked ino one geographical location.

Most of the digital nomad hubs have the same laws with regards to worker protections and tax residency; they're just too poor to enforce them. The same is true of the workers themselves. In the 2010s I remember seeing a lot of guys bragging about having virtual assistants in the Philippines. This was probably illegal on both sides of the transaction the way that they had it set up, the issue is that the people working these jobs do not have the resources to pursue a case against a US-based employer; that's assuming they have the knowledge and motivation necessary to sue the employer in the first place. I'm not as libertarian as I once was, but these kinds of arrangements are a no-brainer; it's all of the upside of the free movement of labor with none of the downside of that labor being physically relocated.


Trump is using century-old misinformation about tariffs to raise tax revenue to pay for tax cuts on the wealthy. In reality, it's an added tax on all spending that accelerates inflation.

Tariffs are theoretically supposed to encourage domestic production, but rely on the false premise that all raw and intermediate materials can be sourced domestically at a cost below the import price. That has generally proven to not work unless tariffs are in the hundreds of percent. But at that level, import taxes tend to poison entire sectors due to supply lag instead of drive domestic economies.


Interesting, do you have a source to get more information about this?


It's a bit difficult to nail down direct citations for what is basic knowledge of how tariffs work in reality. It's covered in AP/college macroecon and U.S. history classes.

Wikipedia's articles on Smoot–Hawley and the Tariff of Abominations both have sections on their effects.

In short, we'll see a brief rise in the domestic economy, then a sharp recession. One of the reasons SE Asia, BRICS, and the EU have been so active to disconnect themselves from the U.S. is they don't want to get caught up in the U.S. economic failure like they did in the 1930s.


This type of approach is called protectionism, the Wikipedia article is pretty good and goes into the implications of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectionism


I'm taking bets, do you think the tariffs will:

1. be rescinded/paused in [0,2) days;

2. be rescinded/paused in [2,4) days;

3. be rescinded/paused in [4,7] days;

4. not be rescinded/paused.


3.5) rescinded/paused [30-61) days. There will be some bluster, and then announcements with the large trading partners like Japan, South Korea, etc., that some new deals have been struck.


that some new deals have been struck.

I believe that was the plan all along. He's just doing it aggressively with tariffs.


5. All of the above.


The ones in food are often oxygen absorbers instead of dessicants. They contain iron "sand" that is, unfortunately, not reusable. They're usually very flat and have a "do not microwave" warning on them in addition to "do not eat".

(This is not to say dessicant packets aren't used in food, just that not all of those packets are dessicants)


Can you point to an example?

Silica packets are definitely used in foods that need to be kept super-dry, like seaweed or nuts -- absorbing residual moisture that was in the product during packaging.

I've never heard of an oxygen absorber used in food. A lot of snacks and things (e.g. all potato chips) in airtight containers are packaged in nitrogen so there's no oxygen in the first place.

Are they for small-scale food production that can't use nitrogen? I've never encountered them in my life.


The Gimme-brand seaweed snacks I get contain oxygen absorbers. So do packages of Tillamook Country Smoker jerky and meat sticks.

They seem to be fairly common with packages of jerky and other self-stable cured meats.


Bacon bits, fried onions, beef jerky.


I've seen these in imported Asian products, especially from China and Japan. Biscuits and similar dry snacks.

I've never seen it for a European product.


There are both. Oxygen absorbers are used for moist snacks, apparently.


This seems a very odd outcome. After all the supposed changes post-9/11, I would think an international flight crew would need to be known to the destination and have entry clearance just to operate the flight.


Of h.264, h.265, vp8, vp9, and av1, h.264 is the only codec with consistent support across all of chat/messaging clients, browsers, smart TVs/phones, tablets, and streaming devices. The population of active, supported devices and software is much larger and much older than people realize. As such, it remains the only viable video codec if you don't want to be forced to provide multiple encodings.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: