I genuinely thought software.com was like a lorem ipsum placeholder (particularly in the context of the other two being blank). Went to the site ... it feels even more like a fake company. There is so much here but it all feels like an empty shell?
I consider that the core of Windows (the NT kernel and win32 api) is actually a very polished gem but it is encased in layers of upon layers of barely polished turds ( winui, the win11 shell, the over agressive telemetry, forced ms635 integration, etc..)
I don't think the people in this thread have any concept of how much $$$ it costs to distribute a free container that is going to be downloaded billions of times.
You are a farmer, not a big fancy profitable one. Your tractor is from 1970 and works great, when it works. Your wife has health problems and can't really help out around the farm much - kids have gone off - so you just do things mostly by yourself. With your lucky dog Skip by your side. Even though times are tough and money ain't coming in like it used to - you still give free produce to the local schools and shelters. You've been doing it for over 20 years, and the community loves you for it.
But then your wife passes. Medical bills are too high. You can't give away free produce to the local schools anymore.
The community is outraged. They come to your farm with pitchforks. They set your barn and fields on fire.
> I don't think the people in this thread have any concept of how much $$$ it costs to distribute a free container that is going to be downloaded billions of times.
Not very much at all. It looks like they're hosting on Docker Hub which doesn't charge for bandwidth. I could create a pro account for $11/month and be able to serve an image billions of times. The compute to build an image is small enough that it can be done at whim on a dev machine.
But when you plug in the numbers: that the farmer raised $126 million, and hosting unlimited Docker Hub pulls costs $11/month, it doesn't quite feel the same.
It's more like the farmer was giving leftovers for free to schools and it was so good that it made him famous. People from all over the country came in, including businessmen who told the farmer he is missing out and should be charging more for his food.
He started a restaurant chain but, the businessmen went further and said that a quality product cannot be given away for free and made him stop supporting schools and shelters which got him rich and famous in the first place. Even tho, he was just handing over leftovers (it cost around USD 100 to host a docker image - yearly)
Think EA, Microsoft and Xbox, Broadcom and bitnami.
From an outside perspective, this looks silly. Like fitting a square peg in a round hole. But I do ack "what if we could run vm's as easily as we run containers" use case and atm it seems like things like this (and katacontainers) are the only ways to do it. Wondering a few things: do all the layers of abstraction make things brittle and how is performance impacted?
It uses Kata with Firecracker which gives you as light of a boot as it gets. Subsecond booting for instance is accessible with a lighter rootfs, which is also on the roadmap (one of the easiest items, actually). The k8s layer doesn't add overhead either compared to any other VM. If you want to compare to bare containers, depending on workload, you could see a 5% overhead due to virtualization. Exact overhead would depend on workload.
In general, some wifi routers will offer to isolate cross-forwarding between WLAN hosts. Depending on the model, one may not be able to modify this setting.
"Black lives matter. Trans rights are human rights. No nazi bullsh*t."
Plaster? Are you referring to this singular line of text way down on their main page? If this statement precludes you from using the project I would imagine it is working as intended.
