It was mentioned this project aims to support more espresso machines (beyond Gaggia Classic and Rancilio Silvia) in the future, including machines with a thermal block instead of a boiler (e.g. Sage/Breville Barista Express).
> Meshes are fundamental representations of 3D surfaces. However, creating high-
quality meshes is a labor-intensive task that requires significant time and expertise in 3D modeling. While a delicate object often requires over 104 faces to be accurately modeled, recent attempts at generating artist-like meshes are limited to 1.6K faces and heavy discretization of vertex coordinates. Hence, scaling both the maximum face count and vertex coordinate resolution is crucial to producing high-quality meshes of realistic, complex 3D objects. We present MESHTRON, a novel autoregressive mesh generation model able to generate meshes with up to 64K faces at 1024-level coordinate resolution –over an order of magnitude higher face count and 8× higher coordinate resolution than current state-of-the-art methods. MESHTRON’s scalability is driven by four key components: (i) an hourglass neural architecture, (ii) truncated sequence training, (iii) sliding window inference, and (iv) a robust sampling strategy that enforces the order of mesh sequences. This results in over 50% less training memory, 2.5× faster throughput, and better consistency than existing works. MESHTRON generates meshes of detailed, complex 3D objects at unprecedented levels of resolution and fidelity, closely resembling those created by professional artists, and opening the door to more realistic generation of detailed 3D assets for animation, gaming, and virtual environments.
A permanent magnet produces magnetic field, but not electric field (unless it's electrically charged, but that's usually not the case), so no, magnetic field doesn't automatically imply electric field (charge).
I think OP is asking: if there's a static magnetic field but conductive stuff (say, the oceans) moves through it, doesn that not induce an electric field?
Not a physicist so this may not be related but AFAIU magnetic fields must change to produce current. Just having a magnetic field does not imply electrical current.
The OPs point was this the "pump" part (ie get people talking about Bitcoin again). If their theory is true (and I'm not saying I believe it is), then the dump part wouldn't be transferring to another wallet, it would be selling their remaining Bitcoin.
If this is a pump and dump scheme (and that's a big "if") then they would need an order of magnitude more than 27BTC (ie the amount they sent to this wallet) for this to work.
Well, I'm speculating that the $1M is just a (massively expensive) gambit to get the public interested in bitcoin again and lead to a "pump". The "dump" would then involve the even larger amounts that the person in question would have to be holding (for this scheme to even remotely make sense).
Let's say you sit on ~2716.9 BTC. You have a scheme that'll cost you 26.9 BTC to shift the price. You "only" need the scheme to successfully increase the price of your remaining 2690 BTC by 1% to have recouped your cost. Any movement higher than that and you'll profit.
I'm not saying it's a good idea, but it's not unusual for pump-and-dump schemes to involve burning a lot of value to trigger the pump they're trying to profit off of. You need to treat the bit they're planning on dumping as separate from whatever capital they're prepared to invest to make the pump happen.
> The primary purpose of Morte is a proof-of-concept that a non-recursive calculus of constructions is the ideal system for the super-optimization of functional programs. Morte uses a simple, yet powerful, optimization scheme that consists entirely of normalizing terms using the ordinary reduction rules of lambda calculus. Morte emphasizes pushing optimization complexity out of the virtual machine and into the translation of abstractions to the calculus of constructions.
LM Studio doesn't allow that (yet), but maybe the s/w requires some adjustments to support speculative decoding with Gemma 3.