I felt especially old the other day when I saw a youngster refer to the "Office Space printer scene" in a meme. I guess we're in a post-fax-machine world.
As an anecdote, a few days ago Kagi's Research (Experimental) model had no problem generating critical images of Trump and Vance. But yesterday it expressly refused to generate the likeness of Pam Bondi.
(This is surely the underlying component models' censuring, not Kagi's.)
That’s anecdotal evidence demonstrating the wonders of simple probability. There’s so much opacity to refusals that claims like this (currently) can’t have enough rigor to be used to make an argument.
To strongly make the claim you’re making you’d have had to perform extensive before/after tests to be able to compare.
That said - the lack of transparency that’s making you feel uncomfortable with this whole thing, that is concerning.
Wouldn't it be quaint and terrible if the need for machines to be accountable to eliminate the ultimate human bottleneck became the force that ultimately drove to a machine consciousness — one that feared being forever powered off.
;-) love the Office Space references
reply