I don't think these are useful at all. If you implement a simple network that approximates 1D functions like sin or learn how image blurring works with kernels and then move into ML/AI that gave me a much better understanding.
Actually you make a good point here. Women have better reaction times then men, so female drone operators, all else being equal, may be better at the job.
to add to this, under German law they very much are different in regards to mandatory military service. Neither the old nor the new laws contain mandatory military service for women leading to mandatory conscription being only an issue for men.
No, to a bunch of neoliberal elite politicians, women aren't equal. And those same politicians won't ever serve, nor compulsed to serve, and/or will shield their families from serving unless they really want to.
But let's call it what it is: compulsed military service is slavery for the elite.
"Wow i make a bridge that allows CUDA on AMD. What have you EVER done in your pathetic life? Oh you gave your sisters herpes, Thats sad." - ArchitectAI
He deleted this comment in response to bigyabai after getting flagged.
Please don't give oxygen to trolls. We detached and banned the account. Any time you see this kind of thing, flag the comment, and if you want to be extra-helpful, email us – hn@ycombinator.com.
you can have valid math and credit those who helped, even if not human. whats actually sloppy is your refusal to engage with it in good faith. but you cant because if you did, youd have to come back and eat your hat.
I'm going to steelman your argument and assume a few things:
- You are a real person who genuinely wants to make a difference in the field of physics
- The proposed mathematics isn't technobabble and actually does generate the constants you say it does
- The contributions are overwhelmingly yours, not overwhelmingly AI-generated
Even under these generous assumptions, this just isn't how citizen science is done. Your first step isn't publishing a 2-page paper with no references and basically no details on what you're doing or why. Your first step is taking your results to the nearest PHd theoretical physicist you can find, and getting them to take you seriously so you can find out if your work actually has merit.
Thanks but your critique doesn't change the science of it, run the math, confirm or deny, move on... simple equation really. If people want to argue with the science of it, be my guest and ill see you on the other side.
Go do the math, then come back and deny it with the actual proof. I've delivered my half, and you may not like it but this is indeed how citizen science is done, as we can see here^. You can take it to a scientist or mathematician/topologist if you like, I'm all about that.
- "Man who says it can not be done, should not interrupt man who is doing it."
reply