You might try to find some local group or club about one of you interests. Having common ground might help.

I long for quantum computing where white space will be able to be a space and a tab at the same time.

I was thinking to start planking (not just for fitness but also as a mean for stress inoculation).

1. You can do it at home. 2. It's short: when starting out, you might just be capable of holding the position max 1 minute. 3. you don't need special dressing or tools, the floor is all you need (a yoga mat would make it nicer though) 4. when done on the elbows, you can even use your phone while you do it (provides you consider that healthy)

It really seems a no brainer form my angle.

I am also getting interest in Fascia training (that's for old men, mind you)

Documentation is never really in sync, thus it's an heuristic. Henceforth, you could setup a pipeline to use AI for that. Not everything will be correct, but it never really is (unless the project is very small and focused or is very old and changes slowly).

Depending on your needs it might be a viable solution.

No, unless they also use subagents.

> This project was developed with assistance from AI/LLMs (including GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and related tools), supervised by a human who occasionally knew what he was doing.

That's the good part of AI. Lowers effort and knowledge barrier and makes things possible.

I strongly suggest to also allow to define a non summarizable part of the context so that behavioral rules stay sharp.

I agree and this is part of what DeepMyst is capable of doing

Is it already there? Pretty cool.

Interesting, I was trying to implement this using AGENTS.md and the runSubagent tool in vscode. Vscode has not yet the capability to invoke different models as subagent so I plan to fallback to instructing copilot to use copilot-cli and gemini-cli. (I am quite angry about copilot CLI offering only full blown models and not the -mini versions though)

I'm planning to add copilot, cursor and cline but feel free to contribute to the repo if you would like to do that and will look for ways to use the mini versions of the models as well when I integrate copilot CLI

Problem is, Copilot CLI doesn't really supports free or mini models. You have very tight choice of models. This looks like product decision. I understand why they won't allow you to use the free models on CLI, but not being able to use the (pay for) mini models is beyond me.

copilot support was just added in version 0.2.2

> Since the Subject creates the Product, the Subject is superior.

Spoiler: You are the Product.

I see your point, and in a sense, you're right. My model is rooted in the Stanislavski Method and the philosophy of Ghost in the Shell. I had to consume and internalize these 'cultural inputs' to synthesize this framework. So, on a deterministic level, I am indeed a 'product' of my environment and experiences.

However, on a functional level, the S-M Protocol (Stanislavski Model) is about how the Subject (the human) chooses to perceive its Products (emotions and reactive states). In this model, these products are treated as a 'Shell.'

From my internal, first-person perspective, the Shell is neither the Subject nor a mere Object. I understand that from a second or third-person perspective, my Shell might look like the entirety of who I am. But think of it like a profession—say, a lawyer. When people talk about 'the lawyer,' they think of the person, but being a lawyer is just a functional role within a social system; it doesn't define the totality of their being.

So, while emotions might be seen as the 'subject' from an outsider's lens, from the first-person view, they are a transitional state: neither the 'I' nor just a 'thing.' They are the Shell I navigate through. My protocol simply grants the Subject the administrative rights to manage that Shell.