You can probably fit a normal sized car and trailer in the space of an F150. Stupid argument. Or, you know, rent a trailer. It's utterly idiotic to carry around the weight and size of the F150 when you don't need the loading space. I hope American gas prices adjust to reality and people start considering efficiency, cause this mentality is not sustainable and hurts everyone on the planet.
I find that the Unihertz Titan 2 with its capacitive scrolling physical keyboard to be an even better reading/doomscrolling vessel than a long touch screen phone where the act of scrolling may accidentally open something.
The Clicks Communicator appears to be a bit smaller than the chonky Titan 2, but for those looking to end doom scrolling, this might not be the phone for you.
That said, using a rectangular phone does make the device unappealing for most video based platforms (which are all either in widescreen or tall landscape mode). It'll do in a pinch, but a square screen is pretty good at making Youtube/Tiktok/etc. less appealing.
I think he talking about e-mails to and from proton mail and other email providers are not really encrypted. Only mails between proton mail are encrypted.
Individual emails are only encrypted if the sender encrypts them, yes, and it's only enabled by default between protonmail users. However, the mailbox as a whole is encrypted at rest with some one-way method that doesn't allow proton to decrypt it: https://proton.me/blog/zero-access-encryption
> However, the mailbox as a whole is encrypted at rest
The server still receives from other servers and from the client (if the email is not going to a proton account) the plain text, so nothing prevents them from making a copy.
They only have to comply with Swiss courts, but they're pretty up front about what they can and can't do, including suggesting Tor for anonymity, and the difference between Mail and VPN in Switzerland (VPN is no logs).
I recall using desmos to render solutions to constraints in my physics classes in college. My favorite was plugging in the equation for the normal modes of a driven, oscilating square sheet and watching the vibration pattern pop right onscreen.
It removes flouride as well, for better or worse -- one of very few available filters which do. (Some think flouride is good and some think it's bad.)
I have it, and purely ergonomically, it's the best filter I've ever used. It's also quite expensive with expensive filters that need replacing frequently.
This isn't a some think it's good and some think it's bad kind of thing. Just like with climate change there's no legitimate other side.
Fluoride in your water supply is key to reducing tooth decay. Every medical association every scrap of evidence that we have says it's useful and important. It cuts tooth decay by 25% or so at all ages. You're doing yourself and your family a massive disservice by not adding it back in, never mind causing yourself a lot of pain and losing a lot of money in the long term.
I think it's ironic that people don't listen to doctors when they suggest simple proven methods that have a worldwide consensus behind them and unlimited evidence. But then are willing to let those same doctors drill into their skulls when they're in pain. Don't be that person :)
Nanohydroxypatite seems more effective than fluoride. But stannous fluoride looks like it has more overall benefits than sodium fluoride if you want to go to the fluoride route.
Some toothpaste have both, Dr jens for example which does have the 10% concentration shown most effective in clinical trials
reply