Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | swiftcoder's commentslogin

Most streaming services commission their own content, yes, but they do so to market original content - Netflix Originals don't pretend to be Wes Anderson movies, and get slid into your playlist when you aren't looking

So if they played a short annoncement beforehand so people know its an Original, it would be fine? Originals get advertised heavily, next-movie, so I assume putting it in the same playlist is fine.

It would at least be better, than sneakily trying to substitute it for artists they'd actually have to pay royalties to, yes

Is this just a really ubiquitous typo (google finds multiple headlines with the same spelling), or is the rendering of "Vietnam" into English spelling somewhat unstable?

The only real results on Google are the article and this HackerNews post...

Did you search "vienam" with the quotes? duck duck go turns up a number of articles (albeit in at least one case the typo is in the metadata, not the article itself)

Never seen it before today...

Definitely a typo, see "vietnam-news" in the same URL.

It is just this article.

ubiquitous? "Vienam" (with quotes) shows this page as the first result.

Every time I read one of these, I'm increasingly convinced that the whole AI crowd are just high as kites 24/7. Must be some good drugs in the valley

Gergely Orosz (The Pragmatic Engineer) interviewed Yegge [1] and Kent Beck [2], both experienced engineers before vibe coding, and they express similar sentiments about how LLMs reinvigorated their enjoyment of programming. This introduction to Gas Town is very clear on its intended audience with plenty of warnings against overly eager adoption. I agree that using tools like this haphazardly could lead to disaster, but I would not dismiss the possibility that they could be used productively.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZE33qMYwsc

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSXaxOdVtAQ


Anecdote, but some of the time when I am blasted after a day of thinking for my job all day a design session randomly throwing shit at an LLM hits the spot. I usually make some meaningful progress on a pet project. I rarely let the LLM do much pure vibe coding. I iterate with several LLMs until it looks and feels right and then hack on it myself or let the LLM do drudgery like refactoring or boilerplate to get me over the humps. In that sense I do strongly agree.

Beck was in Melbourne a few weeks ago, and his take on LLM usage was so far divorced from what Yegge is doing that their views on what LLMs are capable of in early 2026 are irreconcilable.

> the whole AI crowd

It's far from a homogenous crowd. Yegge stands out with extreme opinions even from people who adopted the new tools daily.


It's techno-freemasonry. One must break through the symbolism. The author wielding it and transmitting it cannot just plainly say the knowledge. We don't have the vocabulary or grammar for these new things, so storytelling and story universes convey it. The zoomorphism and cinematic references ground us in what all these bots are doing mimetically.

I'm excited the author shared and so exuberantly; that said I did quick-scroll a bunch of it. It is its own kind of mind-altering substance, but we have access to mind-bending things.

If you look at my AgentDank repo [1], one could see a tool for finding weed, or you could see connecting world intelligence with SQL fluency and pairing it with curated structured data to merge the probabilistic with the deterministic computing forms. Which I quickly applied to the OSX Screentime database [2].

Vibe coding turned a corner in November and I'm creating software in ways I would have never imagined. Along with the multimodal capabilities, things are getting weirder than ever.

Mr Yegge now needs to add a whole slew of characters to Gas Town to maintain multi-modal inputs and outputs and artifacts.

Just two days I go, I had LLMs positioning virtual cameras to render 3D models it created using the Swift language after looking at a picture of what to make, and then "looking" at the results to see the next code changes. Crazy. [3]

ETA: It was only 14 months earlier that I was amazed that a multi-modal model could identify a trend in a chart [4].

[1] https://github.com/AgentDank/dank-mcp

[2] https://github.com/AgentDank/screentime-mcp

[3] https://github.com/ConAcademy/WeaselToonCadova/

[4] https://github.com/NimbleMarkets/ollamatea/blob/main/cmd/ot-...


I just tune out and wonder why someone thought it's good idea to link it and expose others to the suffering

They are high on ego and self-importance, that they are.

Investors are getting impatient

I mean a higher than average amount of them are, there is a whole psychadelics movement within tech. Just look at Elon Musk and his ketamine usage.

Also, Bill Atkinson of Apple fame.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44530767

(posted here a few months back)


"Lets make extreme generalizations about tens of thousands of people because of an extremely unique outlier (who doesn't even belong to that group of people)."

Ok fine, here is some data that isn't from a unique outlier:

"Psychedelics are the latest employee health benefit" (tech company) https://www.ft.com/content/e17e5187-8aa7-4564-9e63-eec294226...

"A new psychedelic era dawns in America" (specifically about use in california) https://www.ft.com/content/5b64945f-da21-46d9-853f-c949a95b9...

"How Silicon Valley rediscovered LSD" https://www.ft.com/content/0a5a4404-7c8e-11e7-ab01-a13271d1e...

I could go on, but the knowledge that psychadelic drugs are prominent in the tech community is not a new fact.


The shocking changes to the culture over the last 20 years start to make a lot more sense when you realize someone decided to flood the society with mass quantities of prescription Amphetamines.

prescription amphetamines don't do this if you are taking the prescribed dose (and you're not getting enough prescribed to get anywhere near high)

Yeah, well, lots of people aren't doing that.

This is instantly recognizable as the work of someone who's been up for a couple days on Adderall.

Of course, there may be other explanations, including other drugs. But if I was one to bet...


The writing doesn't feel particularly out of character for Yegge, who has always been at least a bit like this. (Though I don't know if that's just him, or drugs as well.)

They’re the new bitcoin bros.

Eh, it took me all of 2 days to strip all the unnecessary cookies out of our product, and convince management to leave out the giant unnecessary cookie banner.

The sites plastering those everywhere are doing a malicious compliance, pure and simple


I love that I'm reading this on a site that has decided to obscure the content with falling snow for the holidays

> grenada too

Grenada is something of a joke in this context - the entire thing came about because the communist government fell apart and started fighting internally, so it's pretty likely the regime would have shortly collapsed with or without the invasion


This is a bit like asking Cubans in the US how they feel about Castro. The ones who left don't tend to be the most ardent supporters of the regime...

> Whatever the US is trying to achieve in Venezuela, it's probably not that

Presumably we're only trying to annex their oil reserves


The polls[0] on the war do not necessarily fall along party lines

[0]: https://usapolling.substack.com/p/america-marches-into-anoth...


> 60% of Americans oppose sending US troops into Venezuela to remove Maduro from power. Support is heavily concentrated among Republicans, with 58% in favor, compared to just 21% of independents and 14% of Democrats.

But they do.


So there we see that the vast majority of the country opposes this war.

60% is far from vast and the party in power is all for it.

60% represents a considerably greater margin than any presidential election in recent memory

Now that Trump has reported that Maduro was removed from power, it will be interesting to run this poll again and see the support given the success of the operation.

> "Justified" in what sense?

"Justified" in the sense of "went to congress for a declaration of war". You know, that thing Presidents stopped doing in the early 2000s.


The War Powers Resolution (WPR) of 1973 sets a 60-day limit for U.S. forces in hostilities without a formal declaration of war or congressional authorization, allowing for a potential 30-day extension for withdrawal, totaling 90 days, after which the President must remove troops.

Examples of bombings/ground invasions using WPR without congressional AUMF:

Invasion of Grenada (1983) (7,300 US troops, 19 KIA)

Invasion of Panama (1989) (27,000 troops, 23 KIA)

Airstrikes on Libya (1986) (and 2011) [Obama administration argued they did not need Congressional authorization because the operations did not constitute "hostilities" as defined by the War Powers Resolution. Therefore, they argued, the 60-day clock never started.]

Kosovo Air Campaign (1999) [The bombing campaign lasted 78 days in violation of the 60-day limit]

The Mayaguez Incident (1975)

Syria Missile Strikes (2017 & 2018)

Assassination of Qasem Soleimani (2020)


The US Congress didn't pass a declaration of war for Vietnam, Lebanon, Laos, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Honduras, Panama, or Iraq I, all before the 2000s and since the last declaration (WWII). That doesn't include the UN-authorised military interventions.

While I in no way endorse whatever batshit insane things Trump is doing, I don't think the US has issued a declaration of war since WW2. Declarations of war have been quite rare internationally in general since the end of WW2 outside of a few examples.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: