Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | longitudinal93's commentslogin

Already tried that. Both from my home IP in Canada and from a commercial VPN service exiting in Canada and the US. No joy.

Use a new machine, new email and a new VPN.

You don't need a lot of RAM to run TruNAS. 16gb should be sufficient unless you are planning lots of VMs.

16GB is _not_ sufficient if you have Jellyfin or Immich or similar and a lot of media you want to scroll through quickly; I've found I need a lot of ZFS cache for that to be as responsive as I want, even with SSD storage.

uBO quit working on mainline Chromium a few months back.


There's a little feature flag command line trickery to toggle Manifest v2 which should still work on mainline 140+ onwards.

According to the source code and Gerrit this hasn't been patched out yet:

--disable-features=ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported,ExtensionManifestV2Disable


Unfortunately Matrix hasn't yet implemented any PQ encryption so you are subject to store and harvest attacks.


Just tether through your shit phone


I recently added a second phone for secure comms (Graphene). The biggest hassle turned out to be moving data between them. For that I settled on running my own Matrix server.


10 edits in 24 hours. Been that way for ages.


Won't that get blocked too? In any event Signal is already quantum-safe and open source and audited.


I don't think signal is quantum-safe...I thought they used an older encryption scheme.


Illegal ≠ blocked


how is qryptchat illegal??


Putting it into a public blockchain prevents it from being altered after the fact.


Do you think the government would be able to get away with altering data after the fact? If they released it, someone downloaded it, and would be able to easily spot changes. It could even be (and probably is) automated.

And either way, what does the blockchain offer if the government comes out and says that some previously published numbers were incorrect, and they publish new ones? You'll have two competing versions of the same data, with one considered obsolete because the government says so.

And none of this matters if they're altering the data before publishing.


Is that an actual problem we've had?

Nb announced revisions aren't a problem at all, and not one that "blockchain" prevents anyway (you can publish new stuff on a blockchain, no problem)


Revisions to initial economic data is common, though, once other slower statistics are compiled into a final GDP/CPI number. The initial month-over-month or QoQ are estimates.


Why alter it when you can call it fake news and fire the person who published it and hire a new person who is commited to "Fair and Balanced" data*

*data is for 'entertainment' purposes only - Names, characters, places, and incidents either are the product of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual data is entirely coincidental.


So does archive.org


It doesn't prevent altering the data before it gets published, though. Garbage in, garbage out.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5432523-trump-fi...


It doesn't prevents the government from firing BLS administrators for reporting correct figures though.


But it does have transit police roving randomly throughout the system


True. I love the skytrain, so I'm not complaining. Just a different perspective


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: