Surely as the traffic Google sends to websites falls and falls, there'll come a tipping point where the websites themselves will feel there's no benefit to allowing Google to index them.
If this happens, Google's generative AI slop will have less and less scaped and regurgitated content to surface to Google users.
> Which suggests that content wins and form just needs to be good enough for the intended audience.
I agree to an extent, but why not put the extra effort into making that content easier to read, especially for those whose vision is degraded (which is ultimately all of us given enough time).
You don't get lucky building both Tesla and SpaceX. Bezos spent the same amount of time and money on a rocket company and they haven't got far. Elon does have something going, it's just unlikely the competence carries over to national and international politics.
The guy is clearly very skilled at identifying opportunities and putting together the best team to execute on them. Probably better than any other human alive today.
People may not like the guy for whatever reason, but saying he isn’t talented is absurd.
The main reason I've done this is to make myself less profitable to Meta. A drop in the bucket, I know, but the more people who do this, the less money Meta makes, which can only be a good thing for the world.
1) I don't particularly care beyond possibly being less targeted for manipulation
5) I wouldn't have thought it was a campaign or effort by Warner Bros, likely just the show itself which seems to have pretty wide editorial freedom (and obviously EFF does have a known position on these matters)
6) Good luck getting timely and well thought-through regulations through the EU / any regulation through the US
reply