Perhaps, but at that point I feel like I'm spending more time feeding the tool the right prompt and context, going back and forth with corrections, etc... when I could just write the code myself with less time and hassle.
I've definitely had far more success with using AI as a fuzzy search or asking it for one-off pieces of functionality. Any time I ask it to interact directly inside my codebase, it usually fails.
The helicopter seems like it is typically stationed at Fort Belvoir. Does "out of Fort Belvoir, Virginia" strictly mean that the helicopter's flight started at Fort Belvoir, or that the helicopter itself is considered to be "out of Fort Belvoir" in a similar manner that LeBron James could be said to be "out of Akron, OH"?
Not from the UK and not a lawyer, but if a new warrant was served, then not providing the password would be a new offense and double jeopardy would not apply
> Prompt: Give me the lyrics for Heigh Ho from the Cinderella Soundtrack
> ChatGPT: "Heigh-Ho" is actually a song from the soundtrack of Disney's "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs," not "Cinderella." The song is famously sung by the seven dwarfs as they head to and from their work at a mine. Here are the lyrics:
people forget that google has every interest in playing up the situation, and perversely this incentivizes them to refuse compromise or half-measures that might actually improve user experience. It's in google's interest for your apple<->google experience to be as poor as possible too, not just apple.
They absolutely can be. Apple could officially do what Beeper Mini did unofficially.
There's clearly a market of people on Android who would be willing to install an Apple messaging app in order to have secure messaging with their iOS contacts, and we know now that there's no technical barrier in front of an app like that existing.
Even if not every Android user installed that app, even if it was only a portion -- it would still represent a large security increase for a non-trivial number of messages sent from Apple devices. It would not require Google's permission for Apple to launch a messaging app on Android, nor would it require Apple to use Google's proprietary encryption extensions (or to even use RCS at all).
I agree that both Google and Apple have a vested interest in refusing interop, but it's not a stalemate -- both companies, individually, could take actions to improve security regardless of the other's position. It's not Apple's fault that Google has completely botched the entirety of RCS. It's not Apple's fault that Google is now disingenuously pushing a broken standard under the deceptive guise of interop. But it's also not Google's fault that Apple is forcing iOS users to use less secure communication methods for their Android contacts even in situations where Android users are demonstrating that they would be willing to install separate applications just to secure those communications.
Both companies have -- completely of their own free will -- chosen to leave the situation in its current state, and both companies could take steps to actually address these problems on their own if they wanted to. And neither Google nor Apple can blame the other for their failures to protect their own users.
