Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flipthefrog's commentslogin

There are far less working VistaVision cameras than 70mm. It wasnt used at all, or just for shooting vfx, for 50 years until recently

This is true but it is far cheaper to scan and develop. Labs have to reset the machines to switch over to 65mm/70mm but are running 35mm every day.

Stubborn old directors like Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, Steven Spielberg, Paul Thomas Anderson, Martin Scorcese... https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/page/shot-on-film/

Films are mostly post processed digitally - but some, like Oppenheimer, are color graded the old optical way. While Dune was shot digitally, printed on film, then scanned back in again!


Would have switched years ago if it wasn't for Adobe. Open source equivalents to Photoshop and Lightroom are NOT viable alternatives

For casual use I use lightroom web and it's good enough for me, if you haven't tried it, I highly recommend.

I'm sure for some workflows it isn't sufficient but for basic edits and raw development it works quite well.


Yeah, i use online LightRoom for checking images in the darkroom actually, but for serious use, the old desktop app is still king. There are alternatives, like the excellent Capture One, but none available on Linux. I could live without Photoshop, but not Lightroom or similar.

Not really equivalent to Lightroom, and not remotely a replacement, but there's Corel AfterShot Pro [1] (source: about 15 years ago, I was one of the (1?) proud Linux users of Bibble 5, its predecessor)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corel_AfterShot_Pro


"It has rendered Maya nearly obsolete" Wow, that is great news. I guess its support for Pixar USD is equal to Maya and Houdini then, so all the big studios can finally switch


OpenUSD got just 1 mention in the release notes. Also wondering what is the state of this feature.

May I ask your opinion, as industry insider, regarding what makes a good and bad OpenUSD support?


That would be both feature completeness of the implementation and also some kind of a native USD authoring mode (editing the structure and layering multiple USD files properly), like Houdini Solaris or Nvidia Omniverse. For now Blender can’t even read/write MaterialX properly. (I’m not an insider though)


Gimp is NOT a good image editor for someone who uses Photoshop professionally. This idiotic claim keeps coming up, year after year, along with suggestions for opensource replacements for InDesign, Illustrator, LightRoom - there really really arent any valid opensource alternatives to most creative software apart from Blender, and Krita for a linited subset of what Photoshop covers. I would have switched to Linux immediately if it wasnt for Adobe


That may be true but, as you've not given any reason, it will come up again next time.


Light green text on light brown background is pretty ridiculous. I gave up after 30 seconds


FYI I don’t see light green text. Website looks fine to me on mobile and desktop. Maybe something wrong on your browser end?


Funny how usage of the the word moat simply exploded here on HN a few weeks ago.


This word has been part of the core vernacular of HN for as long as I can remember.



Sure - right now there is a firehose of money being pumped into money-losing AI companies. The technology is revolutionary but a lot of us are wondering if the winners will be the early movers with big pockets or the late movers using newer/cheaper techniques. There's a gold rush and the question of "moat" is on everyone's mind.

But this isn't the first gold rush in the tech industry and folks have been talking about moats here forever.


That's the broad trend, but I think the spike that they're noting is specifically downstream of DeepSeek, as it peaks in late December of last year.

There's an initial peak in 2023 (haven't looked it up, but I'd bet that was when 'OpenAI has no moat' was on the front page for a while), and then it settles down a ways above the previous average. Since December it's been 1.5-2x more frequent than where it settled after that first peak.


It ebbs and flows, like every other circle jerk ping ponging around within an insular internet community.


Except if you mount an old, so called pre AI lens, on certain Nikons, you will have to disassemble the camera to get it off. Many modern Nikons can't autofocus older AF lenses due to not having a motor. And many AF film SLRs couldnt meter with manual lenses. So far from perfect compatibility. Nikon F mount was introduced in 1959. The oldest mount used today is probably Leica M from 1954


Kind of Blue was smashed out in two sessions. A Love Supreme in one


And flying cars


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: