> As long as it's easy to come up with tasks that any one of you can do, that are easy for humans, but that AI cannot figure out … we don't have AGI yet. And you will know you are close to having AGI when it becomes increasingly difficult to come up with such tasks.
Man I don't know. A random 10 year old has general intelligence and ain't gonna do too well on these tests. AGI is not consciousness, I feel like that also gets confused, and general intelligence is not superhuman intelligence.
It is decentralized. The holder provides the data, which was ultimately provided to them by the government, they're the client. The verifier is the entity that wants to know how old the holder is, the server.
The form are eg things like the JSON Web Token (JWT), Digital Credentials, and the Federated Credential Management API (FedCM).[1][2][3][4][5] The software can be anything since they're expected to use open protocols, so yes, web browsers.[6] Per the Commission, "For remote presentation flows, … the Wallet Instance implements the OpenID for Verifiable Presentation protocol OpenID4VP in combination with the W3C Digital Credentials API."[7]
Good. ZKP is a good way to handle decentralized identity proofs. We can imagine other uses of ZKPs with digital identity wallets, such as proving state political party affiliation for participation in independent e-democracy services without having to provide PII. Good on the Commission for following through on this, not sure we've seen much from them in the protocol space since ISDN.
Good? The academy is about as close to Chinese socialism as it gets, one would think China would excel in such a environment. DEI statements or whatever the Party and its media organs are pushing in the US etc are no different than practices in China that are so thoroughly criticized. Inasmuch as China's academy is beneficial to humanity, good.
Healthcare is a state responsibility. If an when eg the California Medi-Cal program reduces coverage, it will be because the California Democratic Party decided they don't want to pay for it.[1] When California causes anyone to lose coverage, you will have no idea (because it won't be published until LII gets hold of them years later). The fact that no one else will mention this outside of HN comments should be a wake up call about what you think you know.
Artificial superintelligence is UFO-level tech. The most we're going to get is silence, misdirection, and absurd denials for decades to come. It's not as if quantum computers are common commodities.
Lying to US officials is 5 years in prison. Per instance. One assumes other countries have similar laws, but I doubt anyone knows what actually happens in courts outside the US.
Per the Wikipedia article, the "SE must have a minimum subscribed capital of €120,000 as per article 4(2) of the directive".[1] Note that it's the regulation, not the directive, with the requirement.[2] It appears the OP's article discusses an alternative 28th regime model suitable for startups.[3] See also the recent European Commission project group on the subject.[4]
Man I don't know. A random 10 year old has general intelligence and ain't gonna do too well on these tests. AGI is not consciousness, I feel like that also gets confused, and general intelligence is not superhuman intelligence.
reply