Probably Claude Code and Codex are the currently best ones, Claude Code a bit faster, Codex a lot more precise and "engineering" focused.
As long as you figure out how to verify that the built thing actually does what it's supposed to, ideally with automated tests, it's almost fire-and-forget if you're good at explaining what you want and need.
> Just think of how many 3d prints you've seen that consist of multiple parts friction for together.
I've seen probably 10s, ranging from amateur-who-just-unpacked-their-printer to acquaintance who runs a business doing 3D printed products, and none of them come close to the experience of lego bricks, so far I'm not sure I'd actually call it "work". Stack 10 of these "custom" lego bricks and place them next to another stack of 10, and they almost certainly won't be as aligned as proper lego bricks, not to mention the whole thing will fall apart a lot easier.
Also: try taking them apart a hundred times and sticking them together again. If the parts initially stuck together strongly, chances are one of the parts will break down.
> As an EU citizen I'm gladly giving Groenland up (even if it's not in the EU but belongs to Denmark which is, itself, in the EU)
Nitpicky, but I guess ultimately it kind of/might matter: Greenland belongs to the Kingdom of Denmark (Danish Realm), not Denmark. Denmark (often called Denmark Proper) is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, which also Faroe Islands belong to. Denmark is in Europe + EU, Kingdom of Denmark isn't in EU, but main part of it is indeed in Europe.
I think if Greenland was actually part of Denmark, it too would be part of EU, as I don't think you can selectively "unmark" specific territories in a country to not be in EU if the country itself is in EU. But since Greeland isn't actually a part of Denmark, it isn't part of the EU.
> I think if Greenland was actually part of Denmark, it too would be part of EU, as I don't think you can selectively "unmark" specific territories in a country to not be in EU if the country itself is in EU.
Yes, you can. Plenty of overseas territories span the complete gamut between autonomous regions outside the EU and overseas EU regions. Each one is a special case and has specific reasons why there are inside or outside the EU.
Maybe I worded it poorly, or someone of us must misunderstand something. Are you saying there are regions that are outside of Europe-the-continent, but that are a part of EU, as it belongs to a country that is within EU too? Which one(s) are those, if so?
EEA, countries in Europe but not in EU, Schengen and so on I'm familiar with, but it's the first time I heard about Outermost Regions. Thanks for explaining!
The French overseas départements are examples: Réunion and Mayotte (in the Indian Ocean), Guadeloupe and Martinique (in the Carribeans), and Guyane (in South America). There is also Saint Martin (French, but not a département), the Azores and Madeira (Portugal) and the Canaries (Spain). All these places are in the EU and use the Euro despite not being in Europe.
Not to go full on crazy socialist, but isn't there at least a tiny bit of you that want to help these "kooks" instead of trying to hide them from rest of society?
No, we really don't. There are some medications which can reduce schizophrenia symptoms but patient compliance is generally low because the side effects are so bad.
Those medications are already widely available to patients willing to take them. So I fail to see what that has to do with OpenAI.
I'm not sure you can say one behaves one way and the other not, surely depends on lots of variables.
As an anecdote, I'm literally sitting with a lit cigarette in my hand right now, and the little smoke that comes from the cigarette itself, goes straight up.
Simplified, but yes, more or less correct. I'm a patron of theirs, and see it more or less as a donation (obviously isn't, in the eyes of the tax agency).
Particle systems can be very efficient. Modern ones are designed to be able to build this kind of shader from a GUI. If you don't use any kind of physical simulation (and this doesn't), you wouldn't pay for it.
You could build this same set up in a particle system and then have convenient knobs (like physics) to turn on for higher quality instances.
Probably always be true, but also probably not effective in the wild. Researchers will train a version, see results are off, put guards against poisoned data, re-train and no damage been done to whatever they release.
> so Spotify may break the lookup of these IDs in the future.
Luckily, Spotify seems pretty good at backwards compatibility. `spotify:user:$username` still seems to work in the search-bar, must have worked for almost 20 years now, and given that artists themselves use those track URIs and IDs, I'm sure Spotify will be even more careful with those than search query syntax.
As long as you figure out how to verify that the built thing actually does what it's supposed to, ideally with automated tests, it's almost fire-and-forget if you're good at explaining what you want and need.
reply