Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | echevil's commentslogin

A great milestone! Congrats


I love that you were downvoted ha


"supposed" to. That's how the "democratic" governments market themselves to be


Why I don't feel any surprise at all?


Meta hired them and required them to fit into Meta's culture


As far as I can remember it all started since Trump got elected. Before then the tone on Facebook was much more positive than it is now


The word "dystopia" (according to Google Trends at least) had a large spike worldwide in November 2016 and has been consistently trending higher than pre-November 2016 ever since. Trump (or probably just general events around then) did something to the Anglosphere net that definitely made it more negative and cynical.

EDIT: same pattern with "dystopian"


Also, Brexit.


It's just what media always do. No surprise in the words they choose. The words the choose shows they report based on opinions not facts


Democracy is overrated, period


In the sense that some people treat it as perfect, yes. But, as they say, it's the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried.


Nah, that is also bogus claim shifting people's attention away from what really matters. A government ultimately needs to deliver policies benefitial for the country and its people. It is a failure if it cannot do that, not matter how "democratic" it is, like UK or current US. Being more "democratic" won't change anything


What was the brand / model of the tablet? And did the malware do anything else than force setting your homepage?


I still have one at the shop in a box. I will look when I go there.


Curious because I do use a lot of devices from Chinese makers myself and had no issues so far. If it's from a legit brand, I'd need to take a closer look at their products before buying more.


Here are some pics of the box. Somehow I have the box but cannot find the tablet...but it doesn't exactly surprise me.

https://imgur.com/a/wllzfvj

There literally are no markings or any other type of brand/vendor on the box other than what you see.


lol doesn't look legit. not surprising it malware built in


I'm not familiar with news media consumption in Australia, but I wonder would this push users to news aggregators like "News Break" or "Apple News"?


Potentially, but under this law these are likely to also encounter the same issues that Facebook and Google are facing right now. Facebook and Google are only the first named companies affected by this, though the rules are far reaching. I highly suspect things like Apple News would be next on the block to be classified as a "designated digital platform".


I think going after all aggregators would have weakened the government position. The current approach forces Facebook to weigh the likelihood of other orgs getting onto FBs turf, once FB is onboard, the government can go after the others, one at a time. It works better via divide and rule vs having all providers presenting a united front and dropping Australia _en masse_ (which would have a high political cost, vs FB alone which doesn't have a lot of political capital)


Twitter is a big one that doesn't seem to be included at present.


Does Australia have businesses in similar model like Facebook? Or are you talking about completely different models?


I don't believe we do, but I think the government may be thinking that now would be an excellent opportunity for someone to give it a go (our prime minister has a funny saying "if you have a go, you will get a go")


I haven't read the legislation so I don't know for sure, but from what I understand about it, it might be an even better time to start a news media company.

Just by publishing, Google are compelled to negotiate with you on the price to license something that they are being forced to license? I can only imagine that there is or will be some mechanism that allows them off the hook, otherwise it's only a matter of time until they have to leave Australia.


It would be a big risk, considering defamation laws in Australia, not to mention being at the mercy of the government for your business model.

I suppose it has worked in Russia and China though.


> if you have a go, you will get a go

OT and I do understand the meaning, but as a matter of language isn’t this in the wrong order?


Yes, if you assume that both parts refer to the same “go.” But “have a go” here means something like “work hard and contribute to the economy.” It doesn’t refer to possessing the thing you “get” in exchange, ie. money.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: