Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aaronchall's commentslogin

I clicked through hoping you were wrong, saw the first page, and thought, ah, this is legible... then I got to the code blocks and was completely blinded.

I'm not sure what to tell authors of such pages...

reply


easy :) ask for dark theme; will try to implement one soon ;)

update: added; turns out I almost finished it before on a local branch but didn't push to master

reply


> Hitler was akshually a leftist

Have you not read his very consistent and personally defended party platform? He also said that the communists were close enough in ideology to join his party.

The idea that the communists were the opposite of the Nazis and fascists was an idea spread by the communists to create confusion and try to improve their own image.


For some definitions of "close enough" that includes sending each others in camps, making it a crime to defend the other opinion punishable by machine gun, and of course, full scale military invasion of the other country.

But yeah sure, they both talk like they want big changes, so they are the same.

The only thing that the horseshoe theory got right is the inflated self importance of the center.


> "Have you not read his [...]."

Delivered as ordered, lol. It never fails.


Castling requires no prior moves by either piece (King or Rook). Move the King once and back early on, and later, although the board looks set for castling, the King may not.


Yes, which means you carry one bit of extra information - "is castling still allowed". The specific moves that resulted in this bit being unset don't matter.


Ok, then for this you need minimum of two bits - one for kingside Rook and one for the queenside Rook, both would be set if you move the King. You also need to count moves since the last exchange or pawn move for the 50 move rule.


Ah, that one's cool - I've got to admit I've never heard of the 50 move rule.


Also the 3x repetition rule.


And 5x repetition rule


On these sites the idea is that answers belong in the top-level answer posts where they can be voted up and down for the purpose of sorting the competing ideas and forms of responses to the primary question post. Criticisms should remain in the comments until they are integrated and addressed in the answers, at which point they are obsolete and can be removed. Therefore chats belong elsewhere, and are helpfully moved into chat rooms, which you can click through to and read if you're interested.


That's, uh, not quite what I was talking about.


True


Perhaps close in absolute terms but still less than half the total price.

I have never had to replace a screen before, but I have bought new batteries to replace on my own. An easily replaceable one would be nice.


Just reading the comments, I also was thinking this was about Python's tornado library until I recognized it wasn't that. The title needs improvement.

CC @dang


I emailed a title suggestion switching to "... Tornado Cash ..." for clarification.

I wish typing "cc @dang" did something, but to the best of my knowledge it does not / isn't monitored vs email.


This. And then escalate to senior management, all the way to Sundar Pichai.

Additionally, write your congressional and local state representatives, and give them the facts.


There is plenty of anecdotal evidence in these threads about how friendly Googlers used to assist with these issues before management prevented it.


Exactly. People who work at Google can’t be friendly, whether they want to or not.


Categories are mutually exclusive.

Tags aren't. I much prefer searching in intersections of tags to searching for needles that may be in different haystacks.


No, they aren't. Storage position is mutually exclusive, if you choose so, but that's not a property of categories vs. tags.

E.g. the Library of Congress assigns books to several subject headings (categories) where applicable.


Depends on what meaning you put on each word. There is no One True Meaning in this case.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: