They mean it works perfectly for them.

If I get Quantum Leaped back into my younger self, I'll start working on fixing email around 1993.

> If cross-platform sync and push notifications don't matter to you, Apple Mail and Thunderbird are good options.

Cross-platform sync and push notifications are literally part of IMAP.

> push notifications are literally part of IMAP

You are conflating things. IMAP supports IDLE, NOTIFY, and _sometimes_ P-IMAP, but IMAP is never going to trigger a push notification on your iPhone/Android.

> Yes, we have a server runtime between the client app and the upstream IMAP provider.

I cannot see that not being a non-starter for anyone that actually understands it.

Superhuman, Shortwave, Missive, Spark, HEY, Canary, Zero.

Everyone has their own threshold/requirements for privacy.

I completely understand your viewpoint, to be clear.

More likely bacn than spam. Stuff that you agreed to receive, but don't especially want. Even though people don't really want bacn, it's the compromise that society has generally accepted in terms of drawing a line against spam while still catering to allegedly legitimate marketing.

It underwent rapid unscheduled disassembly.

Hank Hill: Are y'all with the cult?

Cult member: It's not a cult! It's an organization that promotes love and..

Hank Hill: This is it.

Does this quote make more sense in context? I don't watch the show.

It makes perfect sense as a comment, seeing the clip from the show doesn't add anything.

I think i'm seeing it now. "This is it" implies Hank is actually looking for the cult in question, something that I guess seems odd to me without knowing the plot of the episode.

Thanks for clarifying though! Oh wait, you didn't.

I don't know if there's anything like a comprehensive high-level guide to philosophy that's any good, though of course there are college textbooks. If you want real/academic philosophy that's just more readable, I might suggest Eugene Thacker's "The Horror of Philosophy" series (starting with "In The Dust Of This Planet"), especially if you are a horror fan already.

Personally, I subscribe to Densa, the journal of the Low-IQ Society.

I love colouring in my issue every month.

This month: Is Brawno really what plants crave?

Lots of companies will draw the line in different places. Some will accept GPLv2 but not GPLv3. Some will accept GPLv3 but not AGPLv3.

Google and Meta have policies against using any AGPL code anywhere.

I wonder why, it is not like it is hard to comply with.

Legal absolutism and intransigency, and maybe some ideological retribution. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I paid my dues in MAANG. Business culturally, control seemed all-important. They seemed to want source they could use without giving a dime to maintainers, if they so chose. Some support was given, but not enough and not uniformly.

The Peer Production License and its relatives are pretty good generally. The problem is always license compatibility. One of the benefits of Open Source licensing being kind of standardized has been composability. There's been a pretty clear gradient of "restrictiveness" of licenses, so when you mix software together, you just have to use the most restrictive license of your dependencies (or one that is more restrictive). Copyfarleft licenses are a good thing, but they make the restrictiveness dimension diverge in different ways, so you can't necessarily mix them with each other, or with the GPL (say).